Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Those Two Faced Leftists - It's All About the Oil

Remember when President George W. Bush launched those attacks on Iraq? Remember how the leftists were screaming blood murder about America going to war? They kept insisting that it was all about the oil, and that the Weapons of Mass Destruction did not exist, and Bush was nothing more than a war criminal, remember?

Now the table is turned on them. Now the socialist puppet Obama is launching attacks in Libya, and Syria, and it's all about the oil, not about what Obama is claiming it is about. Sure Gaddafi is a Islamic maniac who is guilty of training and funding terrorists, but does that give Obama the right to bypass Congress and go to war to oust him? At least Bush got the permission of Congress did he not?

If there is one thing that Obama and his Socialist Democrat pals are good at, it is bypassing normal, legal channels, and doing whatever the Hell they want too!

I want to know where the anti-war crowd is now?

Why is operation pink not screaming at Obama for taking this action when we all know his actions are nothing more than a political scheme to make him look better in the public eye in time for the 2012 elections. We will drop tons of bombs, spend tons of money over there, and Gaddafi will still be in power, and killing his own people because that is what madmen like him do, Saddam did it too!

Obama already gave most of our money away to his communist friends who helped him get elected. They were disguised as being 'Stimulus Packages', and were nothing more than grand payola for the extreme left. His jobs bill only created jobs for union workers, not for regular Americans, and his energy bill, well God help us all but more peoples lives will be ruined if it ever takes full effect.

His health care bill is nothing but a big government takeover of our health care system designed to ruin the best damn health care system in the world. After all, it's not fair that we in America should have better health care than people in third world countries, and other socialist run countries. So here comes the know it all elite with their plan to spread the pain and misery all the way across the board so we all can experience it equally, except for them of course!

Here is another point I would like to make in closing. I would like to point out the total hypocrisy of the left in that they talk about how Gaddafi is was/is killing his own people, and must be stopped! My conservative friends!  Has not the left been killing our own people for years now under the guise of legalized abortion?  It's OK for the left to kill, so why can't Gaddafi do it also?

More reasons why I Protest The Left !!

Friday, March 11, 2011

Should Public Service Employees Belong to Unions?

Police officers, Firefighters, Teachers, and other municipal employees are working everyday providing valuable service to our local communities, that is, until the state or local government won't give them what they want, like higher pay, and bigger benefits. Then they leave their jobs behind and swarm with hundreds of other union member to the steps of the state house, or city hall to picket, and make their demands known to lawmakers.

My question is this. If they are all picketing and parading around angrily, waving signs with nasty slogans written on them, and making a lot of noise, who is protecting and serving our local communities?

We have just seen how ugly these people can be when they don't get their way. Thousands of demonstrators marched upon the Wisconsin State House after the Republican Governor, and the Republicans serving in the State house in Madison decided to push through a bill that took away their right (privilege) to collective bargaining, something union members hold near and dear.

Democratic lawmakers fled the state in order to avoid voting on this bill, they were hiding in motels across the state line in Illinois, what a bunch of cowards! Why could they not stay where they belonged and just vote against the measure?

My question is this: Should those who serve in the local community as municipal or state employees, who receive their salary and benefits from local and state tax dollars be allowed to belong to a labor union in the first place? Seems that their is a definite conflict of interest here between the job they are supposed to be performing in the community, and the political agenda of the labor unions they are forced to belong too.

Seems that serving and protecting the local community should be their number one concern, and that the unions divide their loyalty to the local community, creating the conflict of interest I was talking about, agree? or not?

If your house is on fire you don't want to find out all the firemen are in the state capital marching? Or if your home or business is robbed you don't want to find out all the local cops are out of town protesting on behalf of their police union.  The job must come first, and the local community must be protected and served, not left wide open while they off doing the unions dirty work.

Teachers unions are by far the worst offenders of freedom that exist. Their political corrupt political agendas has all but destroyed education in this country, and they continue to embrace every immoral and unacceptable agenda that they can get their hands on. Teachers who live and work in non right to work states, such as Michigan, are forced to belong to Michigan Educational Association regardless of their personal beliefs.

Like all other unions the MEA sucks money out of their members paychecks in the form of dues, and converts that money by funding everything from the homosexual agenda, to socialist Democratic candidates. Whether it be the UAW, the Teamsters, or the teachers unions, they all are corrupt, and they all are funding the destruction of our free society. Plus these unions receive millions of tax payer dollars that they misuse as well.

I wholeheartedly support the destruction of public sector unions by passing a law, or making it illegal for municipal or state employees working for the local community from belonging to unions. I also support making Michigan, and other states Right to Work states where every worker is given the free choice to belong to a union, or not to belong to one. Of course the unions are against the 'right to work' idea because it would effect their numbers, and less money would be flowing through their corrupt hands.

I believe that what we have seen in Wisconsin is just the beginning of the fight to free the American worker from the strangle hold of big labor thugs, and free up and grow our economy.

Tuesday, March 08, 2011

Is Rob Bell a Heretic? or just Insane?

Recently a huge controversy has erupted over a video featuring Rob Bell, Senior Pastor of the Mars Hill Bible Church in Grandville, MI.  In the video Rob Bell confronts the viewer with questions concerning Heaven and especially Hell in which he ask’s question “Is Gandhi in Hell?”.  Most evangelicals would assume that Gandhi is most assuredly in Hell, but Bell then asks the viewer, “Are you sure about that?”.  He continues to challenge the natural conclusions that most Christians would arrive at concerning the subject of Hell, God, and what we know about Salvation.

Bell paints Almighty God as being mean, and angry, and Jesus as the person who came to save us from God. Bell appears too separate Jesus from God the Father, and paints an incorrect picture of the relationship between the members of the trinity. One would be left to wonder if Bell still believes in the Triune God? Or whether he even believes in Jesus being the only path to God?

Has Bell finally gone completely over the edge? It would appear so!  Pastors and bloggers alike have already branded Bell a heretic, and a Universalist based strictly upon his promotional video.  Is Bell just being slick about promoting his new book? Is this just a slick marketing campaign to create controversy to push book sales since his last book was a flop? Or has Rob Bell actually departed from the Christian faith and embraced false teaching?

The book is not even released yet. The book entitled “Love Wins” if it is anything like the promotional video is sure to anger many more individuals, and create much more controversy in months to come. Bell’s first book “Velvet Elvis” questioned the validity of the virgin birth. Bell seems bent on challenging the very Word of God itself, the deity of Christ Jesus, and very attributes of God.

Bell’s Church, Mars Hill meets in what used to be a big box mall store. Hundreds of people flock to his church every week to listen to him hurl questions at them. The problem is that Bell never gives the answers to the questions he hurls, and leaves the answers up to the listeners to decide for themselves.

The question is how many of those hundreds of people will continue to follow Bell’s teachings? And how many will find the common sense to wake up and go find a Bible preaching church that does not compromise the Gospel?

Is Bells brand of Christianity relative in nature? It would appear that the Biblical doctrine he once taught has been set aside for strange doctrines that do not hold water Scripturally. It appears that Rob Bell has gone off the deep end over time as he read the writings of many authors, when he should have been studying, and meditating on the Word of God.

My Bible states that “God is love, and in him there is NO darkness at all” Bell paints God as a mean, and hateful God that we needed saving from. Did Christ come to save us from a mean and angry God?  Or too save us from our sins, provide us a pardon, and justification by faith, which is reconciliation between God and us? This is often referred to as a restored relationship with God through Christ. This requires an act of our free will, we must choose to come to repentance, and receive the free gift of Salvation, this is how ‘Love Wins‘.

One would wonder if Rob Bell even believes in such a thing anymore?

If Universalism is true, then everyone gets into Heaven regardless of their chosen religion, they believe that every path leads to God. Bell even questions whether there is literal Hell in existence. God declares in His Word that Jesus is the only path to God, and way too Heaven, so who is right here, God or Rob Bell? 

The Universalist viewpoint disposes of the need of a Savior, and takes away the need for the Shed Blood of Christ on the Cross. God is just automatically saving every person no matter kind of life they lead here on earth.  If Gandhi somehow got into Heaven on his good works, then God is a liar when he say's that Salvation is by grace through faith, and that it is not the result of our so-called good works. Gandhi was a Buddhist who believed that Jesus was not the messiah, nor God in human flesh, a direct contradiction to Scripture.  

It appears that this what Rob Bell is aspiring too? Is he writing off the entire message of the Gospel, and then replacing it with a Universalist doctrine? It's obvious that he gets off on making people mad to make them think, something he does very well, but that does not excuse departure from God's Holy Word!

My Bible tells me too “avoid every appearance of evil”.  Do you think Rob Bell has followed that advice? Or do you think as I do that Rob Bell has gone off the deep end on purpose? Bell’s promotional video sure does give the appearance of evil, I wonder if his book will be just like his video? It appears that Bell is walking on some shaky ground here, and has departed from the Christian faith he once held too.

Friends if you attend Mars Hill Church, and are a Born-Again Christian who truly loves God, and believes His Word. You have two choices!  Give Rob Bell the Boot, and find a real man of God who will not compromise the truth to take his place. Or find a Church where the Pastor boldly preaches the truth of the Word of God! Get out of Mars Hill as quick as you can!

I hope that Rob Bell will see the errors of his ways, and turn back to the God of the Bible, and the Savior who he once knew. There is a slight chance that Bell never really knew our God? In that case, I would hate to be in his shoes on judgment day!