Saturday, October 21, 2006
The man, Mr. Luis Padilla who was employed in the Human Resources Department of Cargill, a company that provides food and agricultural products and services throughout the world.
The Message read, “Please vote for marriage on Nov. 7”, the company claimed that this message was a form of harassment, Cargill issued this statement. “Although Mr. Padilla is clearly entitled to believe whatever he wants, he has no legal right to act in a manner that violates our company policies of equal employment opportunity, non-harassment and tolerance of differences."
A Cargill spokesman also stated: "When ordered to do something relatively simple – remove from his truck two signs that other employees could have reasonably construed as a show of hostility and intolerance toward homosexuals – Mr. Padilla decided to ignore the warning and disobey the order.
"By refusing to obey the order, he demonstrated that he could not be trusted to enforce and promote our employment policies because his personal beliefs mattered more to him."
This action taken by Cargill against Mr. Padilla is a clear cut case of political correctness way out of control. It is nothing less than a case of corporate cronies attempting to force their intolerant anti-Christian agenda down the throats of the little guy. By taking this type of action, Cargill has shown its blatant intolerance of other peoples viewpoints and beliefs, proving again that the whole intolerance thing is just a one-way street to these left-wing bigots.
An employee has the right to display his/her beliefs, on his/her personal vehicle, whether that vehicle is parked on company property or not. Cargill has violated Mr. Padilla’s civil rights, and should pay a heavy price for the hateful, intolerant actions it has taken against this gentleman.
Let Cargill hear it! Email them! Jam their phone lines, and let them know in NO uncertain terms that this type of behavior by corporations in the United States of America, will NOT be tolerated!
Click here to blast Cargill
Call Cargill at: 1-800-CARGILL (227-4455)
Saturday, October 07, 2006
The instant messages sent from foleys office are said to be part of a prank gone awry between staffers on Capital Hill. These messages just happened to fall into the hands of liberal democrat operatives that have in turn used the messages as pre-mid term election ammo to try and swing the vote thier way.
Without having all the details, mostly because the liberal run media is covering the true facts up and reporting what they want people to hear. It is difficult to ascertain what the truth of the matter is at this time. In my opinion this whole this has been blown out of proportion by liberals for the purpose of fixing the coming mid-term elections.
If Foley is a homosexual, we wouldn't want him on the conservative side anyway, he should be on the other side of the ilse with the other fruit, nuts, and flakes!
In this bloggers opinion, this is exactly what has happened here. Liberals have launched thier attack against conservatives in order to make republicans look bad just before the election. Liberals hope to secure more seats in congress in hopes of capturing the whitehouse in two more years, a dreadfull thought indeed.
Lets not forget when the poster boy of liberal (communist) democrats, Bill Clinton got busted for getting head from page in the oval office, and how he went on TV and lied to the nation saying "I never had sex with that miss Lewinsky". Last time I checked, oral sex was still considered sex!
Funny how all the liberals in America crowed around and defended Clinton even thought the evidence was cut and dry, his semen stain on her dress. DNA doesn't lie! Also on all the other numerous scandels caused by Clinton, and his pet dragon (wife) Hillary, Liberals always make up every excuse in the book to look the other way when one of thier own gets deep in the poop.
Foley is Gay! The headlines read, but wheres the real proof of the matter?
I will raise this argument, not to defend Foley's actions, or cover for him if is actully a homosexual, but if he is, I think Conservatives would have ousted him long ago. The fact is that Conservatives would not have tollerated his homosexual lifestyle, he would not have been able to hide all this time without someone publically outing him, and he should be afforded the right of being innocent till proven guilty.
powered by performancing firefox
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it's pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU's founding. Does the ACLU's communist founding mean anything about what the ACLU is today? Well, if you plant a lemon seed would you expect the tree to produce peaches? Compare their current goals to the 45 communist goals in the Congressional Record and decide for yourself.
One of the greatest myths about the ACLU is that they started out as a noble cause. The roots of a tree go deep. There is no question that it was founded on communist/socialist principles. There is no question to the founder of the ACLU, Roger Baldwin's, ideals.
“I have been to Europe several times, mostly in connection with international radical activities…and have traveled in the United States to areas of conflict over workers rights to strike and organize. My chief aversion is the system of greed, private profit, privilege and violence which makes up the control of the world today, and which has brought it to the tragic crisis of unprecedented hunger and unemployment…Therefore, I am for Socialism, disarmament and ultimately, for the abolishing of the State itself…I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.”
Only after the Nazi-Soviet Non-Agression Pact of 1939, which allowed Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party to take over much of Eastern Europe, did Mr. Baldwin become disenchanted with the Soviet version of Communism. Yet Baldwin held Communist/Socialist sympathies to the end of his life. Later in life, he said,...
"Anti-communism never affected our civil liberties very much. And the Communist party in the United States was certainly never strong enough to be a menace at any time in any way. The only menace was the people who believed in a Communist dictatorship, which is a denial of civil liberties. They did not belong with us in a leadership position."Source
Baldwin rid the ACLU board of overt Communists because of his anger about the Nazi-Soviet pact, establishing a policy that read, in part: "The Board of Directors and the National Committee of the American Civil Liberties Union....hold it inappropriate for any person to serve on the governing committees of the Union or its staff, who is a member of any political organization which supports totalitarian dictatorship in any country, or who by his public declarations indicates his support of such a principle." Source
While Mr. Baldwin made a great show of the Communist purge in 1940 he never let go of his passion for socialist ideals. Neither did the ACLU. In 1961 numerous communist connections were entered into the Congressional Record. In November of 1964 the ACLU came to the defense of Communist-front organizations. The Union argued that there was a fundamental difference between a Communist-action organization and a Communist-front group.
Throughout the 1960s many members of the ACLU took umbrage at the principles of the 1940 Resolution. According to William Donohue's book, The Politics of the American Civil Liberties Union, a 1967 Resolution was viewed by many on the board that voted for it to supersede and effectively rendered the 1940 Resolution impotent. In April of 1967 the ACLU board voted to rescind the 1940 decision of ousting Elizabeth Gurley Flynn for her uncompromising support for Communism. More important than the vote to recognize Flynn was the board's conclusion that "the expulsion of Ms. Flynn was not consonant with the basic principles on which the ACLU was founded and has acted for fifty-four years." The board also agreed that language should be drafted to indicate its happiness with the removal of the 1940 Resolution from the ACLU constitution in 1967."
Today's ACLU still espouses the ideals of socialism under the guise of liberalism. They still defend Communist propaganda. One of the goals of the Communist agenda is to abolish all loyalty oaths. It is interesting that the ACLU celebrate the fact that they will not sign oaths promising not to support terrorism.
Whether today's ACLU is a communist/socialist organization or not their goals most definitely align with the ideologies of socialism. Regardless of what one label today's ACLU there are many dangerous positions in practice that have never changed with them. Their unflinching support of abortion, euthanasia, their strange position on the Second Amendment and their open border policy are just a few examples. They consistently work to thwart the government's efforts to protect its citizens, undermine America's sovereignty, and defend America's enemies. They have defended traitors funding Hamas, the PLO, and confessed Al-Qaeda operatives. All of these seem to support their founder's goal of abolishing of the State itself.
This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com or Gribbit at GribbitR@gmail.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.
Sunday, October 01, 2006
The Letter re-stated the threat against Christiantity, the family, and this nation as a whole. The airwaves are being saturated with homosexual propaganda in order to change the way Americans think about homosexuality, especially to change the values of our children.
The letter states:
"While an ABC news poll shows that 58 percent of Americans believe gay marriage should be illegal, Jewish leftists (like Sumner Redstone, head of Viacom), are pushing against the grain for the gay agenda. 1
At NPN we have been criticized for generalizing about the anti-Christ activism of organized Jewry. But when it comes to pushing for the normalization of homosexuality, progressive Jewry is proud to take credit.
The World Congress of GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender) Jews boasts 50 member organizations. In New York alone, gay Jewish organizations include Congregation Beth Simchat Torah, OrthoDykes, and OrthoGays.
Although some Orthodox rabbis stand fast on Leviticus 18:22 and its prohibition of sodomy, Reform Judaism has been ordaining gays and lesbians since 1990. According to the Jewish daily Forward, conservative rabbis will soon join them, consecrating same-sex marriage and ordaining homosexual rabbis. 2
Last November, Abe Foxman (national director of the Anti-Defamation League) and Rabbi Eric Yoffie (president of the enormous Union for Reform Judaism) gave back-to-back speeches attacking the Christian right. Yoffie’s union is the largest Jewish organization in the United States and includes over 900 congregations.
What did this supposed man of God have to tell his flock? At the Union's biannual convention, Yoffie sermonized to around 5,000 attendees about the “appalling” idea that one group of people might have found the absolute truth about God.
“What could be more bigoted than to claim that you have a monopoly on God,” he huffed. You’d hope a man who thought he was wrong about God wouldn’t be delivering a sermon. But that irony was apparently lost on Yoffie.
He went on to denounce the “homophobia” of the religious right, comparing it to Nazism. “There is no excuse,” he said, “for hateful rhetoric that fuels the hellfires of anti-gay bigotry.” Like Foxman, who also compared Bible-believing Christians to Nazis, Yoffie obviously thinks it’s just fine to fuel the hellfires of anti-Christianity.
Forward magazine praised Yoffie’s and Foxman’s blisteringly anti-Christian screeds for giving “voice to something their constituents have been thinking and feeling for a long time.”
One thing Jewish America is clearly thinking and feeling is that homosexuality deserves public acceptance. In a 2004 Forward article, Jay Michaelson explained the liberalizing of Jewish attitudes toward sodomy. He quoted Jeremy Gordon, a student leader at the Jewish Theological Seminary: “[Homosexuality] has become one of the most important issues for the movement and the seminary and something leadership from across the movement feel needs to be readdressed.”
Michaelson, who directs Nehirim: A Spiritual Initiative for GLBT Jews and edits Zeek: A Jewish Journal of Thought and Culture, comments that even conservative Jews are considering new ways to read Jewish laws against sodomy. But he says media shapes the sensibilities of American Jews more than sacred texts ever will. “The rapid change in the status of gay people within the Jewish community owes as much to [TV show] Queer Eye as it does to novel interpretations of Leviticus.”
Will evangelicals also be more influenced by media’s gay agenda than by their own sacred text, the Bible? Jewish activists hope so. With TV shows like Will and Grace (which ran for 8 years and won truckloads of awards and award nominations), films like Brokeback Mountain, and now an all-gay channel, Jewish media moguls’ motives are clear: Bring gays out of the closet and kick Christian morals to the curb.
1 ABC, Gary Langer, June 5, 2006
2 Forward, “Key Rabbis Say Conservative Judaism Will Lift Gay Ban,” Jennifer Siegel, Aug 25, 2006"
Above article Written by: Harmony Grant
After Reading this letter through a couple of times, I realized that the author was correct, modernistic liberalism is destorying the moral fabric of this country, they are engaging in the same propaganda techniques that Hitler and the Nazi's used many years ago. They refer to Bible believing Christians as Nazi's because we stick to the teaching of Scripture, and our faith in the One True God.
While they have deviated far from the God of thier forefathers, and his teachings which are clearly spelled out in black and white, they spin thier hate filled rhethoric around like a farmer spreading cow manure, and it sticks just as bad.
At the base of this hate filled agenda of the left, are many Jewish Americans that have strayed from the traditional teachings of Scripture. They have embraced moderistic Liberalsim (Communism), and become thier own worst enemy. How easily they have forgotten the holocaust where many of thier own were systemattically murdered by the Nazi's through the means of organized genocide.
Jews were discounted as less than human, and counted as not fit to live. Millions of innocent people were herded into Hitlers gas chambers, and todays generation of Jews could care less. They have forgotten the lessons of history, and as a result are condemned to repeat it. This is the same lie that Liberal Jews in America believe and use as an excuse to support abortion on demand.
Instead, todays modernistic Jew in America unwaiveringly supports abortion, homosexuality as a normal/natural alternative to God's design for human beings, and they overwhelmingly vote Democratic, why?
Why do so many in America vote for thier own demise? Why are liberal Jews so hatefull, and Christophobic?
I say "There is NO EXCUSE for the hate filled rhetoric that fuels the fires of anti-Christian bigotry."
Yoffie also stated "“What could be more bigoted than to claim that you have a monopoly on God,”
Rather I think the question is "What could be more bigoted than bastardizing those who pray and support the Jews and the nation of Isreal."
Yofee and others like him fail to notice that it is the evangelical, Bible-Believing Christians in America that are the thier best freinds. The liberal left that they align themselves with, largely supports the Palestians, and thier agenda to push Isreal into the sea. Do modernistic Jews hate thier own native land? I wonder?
I think liberal jews and thier liberal God hating organizations need to re-evalute where they stand, and what they support. Seems that they are only shooting themselves in the foot! They indeed are thier own worst enemy